SAUNDERS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (71 total)

• DE LA Cosa v. State, 784 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …ion that on remand the trial court was free to impose any sentence it wished are not dispositive here. Herring does not support such an outcome here. Fasenmyer specifically distinguished United States v. Busic, 639 F. 2d 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918, 101 S.Ct. 3055, 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981), which addressed a scenario where the appellate court vacated all of defendant’s sentences. The issue in Bover v. State, 732 So. 2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 743 So. 2d 508 (Fla.1999), was “whet…
• State v. Molina, 461 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982); United States v. Rios, 637 F. 2d 728 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918, 101 S.Ct. 3054, 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).…
• Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 (U.S. 1984)
  …States v. Perez, 700 F. 2d 1232, 1237-1238 (CA8 1983), the court remanded for a hearing as to whether the search and seizure authorized by a warrant was tainted by prior illegality. In United States v. Kinney, 638 F. 2d 941, 945 (CA6), cert. denied, 452 U. S. 918 (1981), the court found no taint, but in that case there was no occupation of the searched premises prior to obtaining the warrant and hence no claim of the type made here. The same is true of the other cases the Court cites, United States v. Bosby,…

  ← 1 / 2 →