MARGOLES

v.

TORMEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Christine, 687 F.2d 749 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …S.Ct. 506, 13 L.Ed.2d 231 (1965); “illegally obtained films,” United States v. Cook, 657 F. 2d 730 (5th Cir. 1981); and “stolen property,” United States v. Giresi, 488 F.Supp. 445 (D.N.J.1980), aff’d mem., 642 F. 2d 444 (3d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 939, 101 S.Ct. 3081, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981); United States v. Burch, 432 F.Supp. 961 (D.Del.1977), aff’d mem., 577 F. 2d 729 (3d Cir. 1978). The warrant at issue cannot be invalidated as a general warrant for it does not vest the executing officers with…
• Hooks v. Hooks, 771 F.2d 935 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …and in a practical and logical sense is final. Second, Texas law accords the same preclusive effect to agreed interlocutory judgments that it does to agreed final judgments. Gregory v. White, 604 S.W. 2d 402, 403-04 (Tex.Civ.App.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 939, 101 S.Ct. 308, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981). Consequently, we must address whether plaintiff would be entitled under Texas law to collaterally attack the order in a separate proceeding. She asserts two possible grounds for collateral attack. The first, t…
• United States v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 762 F.2d 737 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …U.S. 631, 635, 62 S.Ct. 763, 765, 86 L.Ed. 1077 (1942). Nor does it apply if words in the tariff’s language are used “in their ordinary sense.” United States v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, 725 F. 2d 469, 470 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 939, 101 S.Ct. 3081, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981). See also Great Northern Railway v. Merchants Elevator Co., 259 U.S. 285, 291-92, 42 S.Ct. 477, 479, 66 L.Ed. 943 (1922). The ICC has never construed the terms of the volume tariff involved in this case, and th…