GERTRUDE IRENE SIMMONS, PETITIONER,

v.

BRADFORD-PRESCOTT, INC., PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• ABC Liquors v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 397 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …(Fla.1960); Miller v. Brewer Co. of Florida, Inc., 122 So. 2d 565 (Fla.1960); Fidelity Constr. Co. v. Arthur J. Collins & Son, Inc., 130 So. 2d 612 (Fla.1961); Henderson v. Sol Walker and Co., 138 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1962); State v. Florida Dev. Comm., 211 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1968); Daniel v. Florida St. Turnpike Auth., 213 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1968); and State ex rel. Biscayne Kennel Club v. Board of Bus. Reg., 276 So. 2d 823 (Fla.1973). In this case, having a duty to explicate its nonrule interpretation of the governi…
• Mikos v. Ringling BROS.-BARNUM & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1986)
  …983), appeal dismissed, 466 U.S. 901, 104 S.Ct. 1673, 80 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); State ex rel. Biscayne Kennel Club v. Board of Business Regulation of Department of Business Regulation, 276 So. 2d 823 (Fla.1973); State v. Florida Development Commission, 211 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1968). Rule 12D-1.03(l)(c)l states that an object is “normally and usually permanently located” where it is generally kept for use or storage or where an object is consistently returned by its owners for use or storage. Clearly, if subsection 1…
• Hancock Advertising, Inc. v. Dep't OF Transp., 549 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …ding that its statutory authorization applies to this billboard is “clearly erroneous” and thus, under any formulation of the doctrine, may not be followed. See Daniel v. Florida State Turnpike Auth., 213 So. 2d at 587; State v. Florida Dev. Comm’n, 211 So. 2d 8, 12 (Fla.1968); 49 Fla.Jur.2d Statutes § 163, at 196 n. 25 (1984). . In the case of a word like "on," resort to dictionary definitions, which may be appropriate or even determinative in other areas, see Florida Dep't of Revenue v. DeMaria, 338 So.…