SIDNEY BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Andrus v. Fla. Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec., 379 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …time and place scheduled for the hearing before the Appeals Referee. “Due process of law requires either proper notice of the issues to be heard or a basis in the record to show an informed and intelligent waiver of the same.” Lewis v. Hot Shoppes, 211 So. 2d 20, 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Appellant was advised of the hear [*470] ing before the Appeals Referee by a form which called her attention to the fact that one of the issues to be heard was whether appellant was able and available for work. The form prov…
• Smith v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 751 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
  …that the claimant receive proper notice of the issues to be heard or expressly waive such notice; otherwise the claimant is deprived of a fair hearing. See Penton v. Royal Crown Bottling Co., 646 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Lewis v. Hot Shoppes, 211 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Kaufman v. Department of Employment Security, 136 Vt. 72, 385 A. 2d 1080 (1978). Appellant clearly lacked any notice that the company’s additional and inconsistent claim would be heard before the appeals referee. Whether the cl…
• Garfinkl v. Garfinkl, 330 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …evidence by the court’s suggestion and the order entered pursuant to oral motion. See the rule in Mayflower Inv. Co. v. Brill, 1939, 137 Fla. 287, 188 So. 205; Eagle v. Carr, 1943, 153 Fla. 224, 14 So. 2d 268; and Lewis v. Hot Shoppes, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 20. We regard the questions presented on this appeal to be of such importance that they should be settled by the Supreme Court of Florida. This is true both of the decision in this case and of the question of whether an order dissolving a marriage pri…

Authorities Cited

• Plymale v. State, 201 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
• Hagan v. Fabiano Laragione, 205 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1967)