TULLY, COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

v.

NEW ENGLAND PETROLEUM CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• In re the Complaint of William McLINN v. The F/V Fjord, 739 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …e no controlling state decisions providing clear precedent, the views of the resident district judge on matters of state law carry extraordinary force on appeal. — Amoco Production Co. v. Guild Trust, 636 F. 2d 261, certiorari denied 101 S.Ct. 3123, 452 U.S. 967, 69 L.Ed.2d 981. C.A.Wyo. 1980. Absent clear error, Court of Appeals will defer to trial court’s interpretation of state law of its district.— Smith v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 614 F. 2d 720. C.A.Wyo. 1978. Trial judge, having been a member of…
• Tully v. Mobil OIL Corp., 455 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1982)
  …80). The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that appellate consideration of the pre-emption issue was a matter for the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals (TECA). 639 F. 2d 912, cert., denied sub nom. Tully v. New England Petroleum Corp., 452 U. S. 967 (1981). That court, in turn, affirmed the District Court’s decision, but noted that the federal statute would expire by its own terms in September 1981, and that expiration of the Act “will signal the end of federal concern in this area.” 653 F. 2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Atl. Richfield Co. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 769 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …0, 103 S.Ct. 365, 74 L.Ed.2d 400 (1982); Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy, 616 F. 2d 1193, 1198 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979). . Scallop Corp. v. Tully, supra note 39, 705 F. 2d at 650; Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F. 2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967, 101 S.Ct. 3123, 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Coastal States Mktg, Inc. v. New Eng. Petroleum Corp., supra note 39, 604 F. 2d at 185-187; Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy, supra note 39, 616 F. 2d at 1196-1197 and cases cited therein. See also Municip…