EDWARDS

v.

ARIZONA; MARCAL V. LOUISIANA; TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CO. V. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION; CLEAR PINE MOULDINGS, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; ACQUISTO V. LEE COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION ET AL.; BLOCKER V. HERMAN ET AL.; DICK V. GEORGIA; TURNER V. UNITED STATES; MOUNT V. CHASE BANK ET AL.; FREE V. ALABAMA; CHICCO V. PECK; BELL V. ILLINOIS; WINCHELL V. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; JOHNSON V. SCHWEIKER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; BURROUGHS V. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Citator

Cited By

• Kyser v. State, 533 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1988)
  …ained during custodial interrogations after he had requested counsel. We find this issue dispositive and hold that the United States Supreme Court decisions in Smith v. Illinois, 469 U.S. 91, 105 S.Ct. 490, 83 L.Ed.2d 488 (1984), Edwards v. Arizona, 452 U.S. 973, 101 S.Ct. 3128, 69 L.Ed.2d 984 (1981), Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291,100 S.Ct. 1682, 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), require us to vacate Kyser’s conviction and sentence and r…
• Keys v. State, 606 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …, even on charges not related to the juvenile case. According to Keys, Detective Smith’s interrogation regarding the shooting incident violated the rule set forth in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378, rehearing denied, 452 U.S. 973, 101 S.Ct. 3128, 69 L.Ed.2d 984 (1981). The state, in reply, asserts that the trial court correctly relied on Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F. 2d 394 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059, 109 S.Ct. 1329, 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989), in ruling that Ke…
• Hughey v. State, 411 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …oviso that the incriminating statements must be voluntary before they could be used to impeach credibility. In a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), rehearing denied, 452 U.S. 973, 101 S.Ct. 3128, 69 L.Ed.2d 984 (1981), the Court stated that where a defendant was given Miranda warnings and then requested an attorney, a statement made by the defendant before an attorney was present must be suppressed unless shown that the defe…