JAMES ET UX.

v.

FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO. ET AL.; AND HERNANDEZ ET AL. V. O'NEAL MOTORS, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Marquette Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 686 F.2d 608 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …quent legislation reflecting an interpretation of an earlier Act is entitled to great weight in determining the meaning of the earlier statute.’ ” James v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 638 F. 2d 147, 152 (10th Cir. 1980), vacated in part on other grounds, 453 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3134, 69 L.Ed.2d 988 (1981) (On Petition for Rehearing) (quoting Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 349, 98 S.Ct. 2733, 2777, 57 L.Ed.2d 750 (1979) (Opinion of Brennan, White, Marshall & Blackmun, JJ., concurr…
• Luella Wright and Charlie Wright v. Tower Loan OF Miss., Inc., 679 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …Courts have used TILSA to interpret TILA, e.g., Anderson Bros. Ford v. Valencia, 452 U.S. 205, 207-20, 101 S.Ct. 2266, 2270-74, 68 L.Ed.2d 783, 789-95 (1981); James v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 638 F. 2d 147, 148-49, 152 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3134, 69 L.Ed.2d 988 (1981), which is what Tower now asks us to do. Tower has not asked us to apply TILSA retroactively. . Tower’s brief cites “Section 130” of TILSA. TILSA has no § 130. Presumably Tower meant to cite TILSA § 615, which…
• Jackson and Delores Brown v. Frontier Ford, Inc., 666 F.2d 1291 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …ia, 452 U.S. 205, 101 S.Ct. 2266, 68 L.Ed.2d 783 which held that the assignment of the unearned insurance premium did not create a security interest under TILA. On June 29,1981, the Supreme Court entered the following order, James v. Ford Motor Co., 453 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3134, 69 L.Ed.2d 988: “The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the second question presented by the petition. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Hernandez v. O’Neal Motors, Inc…