WILDER

v.

TEXAS; ARMOUR V. TEXAS; GARCIA V. TEXAS; SIMMONS V. TEXAS; PARKER V. TEXAS; AND BRANDON V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States Postal Serv. Bd. of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 (U.S. 1983)
  …ervice, but the Court of Appeals reversed. 206 U. S. App. D. C. 109, 642 F. 2d 514 (1980). We vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U. S. 248 (1981). 453 U. S. 902 (1981). On remand, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its earlier holding that the District Court had erred in requiring Aikens to offer direct proof of discriminatory intent. It also held that the District Court erred in requiring Aikens to show, as…
• Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1983)
  …9 U. S. 78, 88, n. 9 (1976). This statute has been invoked to transfer prisoners from Hawaii state facilities to federal prisons on the mainland. See Anthony v. Wilkinson, 637 F. 2d 1130 (CA7 1980), vacated and remanded sub nom. Hawaii v. Mederios, 453 U. S. 902 (1981). After the decisions in Meachum and Montanye, courts almost uniformly have held that an inmate has no entitlement to remain in a prison in his home State. See Beshaw v. Fenton, 635 F. 2d 239, 246-247 (CA3 1980), cert. denied, 453 U. S. 912 (…
• Shango (Cleve Heidelberg v. Jurich, 681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …stake. The existence of such discretion “preclude[s] the implication of a liberty interest deserving of due process protection.” Anthony v. Wilkinson, 637 F. 2d 1130, 1141 (7th Cir. 1980), vacated on other grounds mem. sub nom., Hawaii v. Mederios, 453 U.S. 902, 101 S.Ct. 3135, 69 L.Ed.2d 989 (1981) (remanded for further consideration in light of Howe v. Smith, 452 U.S. 473, 101 S.Ct. 2468, 69 L.Ed.2d 171 (1981)). The argument that the procedures established by the regulations can themselves be considered…