WOODS
v.
TEXAS; BELL V. TEXAS; BROOKS V. TEXAS; GREEN V. TEXAS; DEMOUCHETTE V. TEXAS; AND BAREFOOT V. TEXAS
WOODS
TEXAS; BELL V. TEXAS; BROOKS V. TEXAS; GREEN V. TEXAS; DEMOUCHETTE V. TEXAS; AND BAREFOOT V. TEXAS
453 U.S. 913
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 190 cases
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (98 total)
-
Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (U.S. 1983)…involved acts of violence. At the guilt stage of the trial, for the limited purpose of establishing that the crime was committed in order to evade police custody, see Barefoot v. State, 596 S. W. 2d 875, 886-887 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980), cert. denied, 453 U. S. 913 (1981), the State had presented evidence that Barefoot had escaped from jail in New Mexico where he was being held on charges of statutory rape and unlawful restraint of a minor child with intent to commit sexual penetration against the child’s will…1 / 2
-
Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1437 (8th Cir. 1987)…the decision whether to initiate a prosecution or in the preparation necessary to present a case that absolute immunity was appropriate for that function in those circumstances. In Forsyth v. Kleindienst, 599 F. 2d 1203 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 3147, 69 L.Ed.2d 997 (1981), a decision related to Mitchell v. Forsyth, supra, the Third Circuit considered evidence-gathering an advocatory rather than investigative or administrative function to the extent that securing additional infor…1 / 2
-
Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 705 F.2d 506 (D.C. Cir. 1983)…nder Clean Air Act § 307(d). For present purposes, we need merely note that, as under the APA, the final rule must be a “logical outgrowth” of the agency’s proposal. United Steelworkers v. Marshall, 647 F. 2d 1189, 1221 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 3148, 69 L.Ed.2d 997 (1981); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F. 2d 1011, 1031 (D.C.Cir.1978). EPA argues that the 1.90 gplg interim standard was a logical outgrowth of the August proposal because it was “within the range of alternative s…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 98 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)