AGSALUD, DIRECTOR OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF HAWAII, ET AL.

v.

STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Fort Halifax Packing Co., Inc. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1987)
  …01 (1986). See [*26] also Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F. 2d 1140 (CA4 1985), summarily aff’d, 477 U. S. 901 (1986). The Court characterizes Standard Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 633 F. 2d 760, 766 (CA9 1980), summarily aff’d, 454 U. S. 801 (1981), as holding that ERISA pre-empted Hawaii’s health care statute because it impaired employers’ ability to “structure] [their] administrative practices according to a set of uniform guidelines.” Ante, at 13. But that case involved more than adm…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Martori Bros. Distribs. v. Jyrl James-Massengale, 781 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …2d 856 (1985) (same). . See, e.g., Shaw v. Delta Airlines, 463 U.S. 85, 103 S.Ct. 2890, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983) (pregnancy benefits required); Standard Oil Co. v. Agsalud, 633 F. 2d 760 (9th Cir.1980), aff’g 442 F.Supp. 695 (N.D.Cal.1977), aff’d mem. 454 U.S. 801, 102 S.Ct. 79, 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981) (alcohol and drug abuse treatment benefits required); Pervel Industries v. Connecticut Comm’n on Human Rights, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff’d mem. 603 F. 2d 214 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031, 10…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Ret. Fund Tr. OF THE Plumbing v. Franchise TAX Bd., 909 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …lans to provide specific health benefits, it could not withstand ERISA preemption analysis. See Standard Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 442 F.Supp. 695, 696 (N.D.Cal.1977) (Agsalud I), aff'd, 633 F. 2d 760, 762 (9th Cir.1980) (Agsalud II), aff'd, 454 U.S. 801, 102 S.Ct. 79, 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981). Congress, wishing to narrowly override the Agsalud cases to allow the experimental program, but fearing it could set a precedent, created this exception specifically for the Hawaii law.40 The amendment had a lon…