WOELKE & ROMERO FRAMING, INC.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; PACIFIC NORTHWEST CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; AND OREGON-COLUMBIA CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
WOELKE & ROMERO FRAMING, INC.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; PACIFIC NORTHWEST CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.; AND OREGON-COLUMBIA CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
454 U.S. 814
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Wardell Riley v. State, 433 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 1983)…m presented by employing a coram nobis sufficiency test to the totally different question of whether the death penalty would have been imposed” in view of the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Stephens v. Zant, 631 F. 2d 397 (5th Cir.1980), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 814, 102 S.Ct. 90, 70 L.Ed.2d 82 (1981). 406 So. 2d at 95 n. 13. For the reasons expressed, I would grant a stay of execution and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the sole issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.…
-
Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862 (U.S. 1983)…t cannot be determined with the degree of certainty required in capital cases that the instruction did not make a critical difference in the jury’s decision to impose the death penalty.” Ibid. [*870] We granted Warden Zant’s petition for certiorari, 454 U. S. 814 (1981). The briefs on the merits revealed that different state appellate courts have reached varying conclusions concerning the significance of the invalidation of one of multiple aggravating circumstances considered by a jury in a capital case.9…
-
United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1982)…s opinion to clarify that Payton did apply retroactively. App. to Pet. for Cert. 12a.5 The Government sought review in this Court. We granted certiorari to consider the retrospective effect, if any, of the Fourth Amendment rule announced in Payton. 454 U. S. 814 (1981).6 [*542] II “[T]he federal constitution has no voice upon the subject” of retrospectivity. Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358, 364 (1932). Before 1965, when this Court decided Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S.…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence