PENNSYLVANIA GAS & WATER CO.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• City OF NEW Orleans v. S. Scrap Material Co., Ltd., 704 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1983)
  ….1981), the Third Circuit held that [*761] “review of orders denying reparations on legal or policy grounds is available by petition for review in the courts of appeals.” See also Monongahela Power Co. v. ICC, 640 F. 2d 504 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 824, 102 S.Ct. 111, 70 L.Ed.2d 97 (1981). . But see Coca-Cola Co. v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry., 608 F. 2d 213, 215 n. 4 (5th Cir.1979) (“In reparations actions the district court has jurisdiction to initially review decisions of the ICC”) (citations omit…
• United States v. Brown, 742 F.2d 363 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …id not charge that Brown converted the funds to his own use. Moreover, the indictment in this case charged more than embezzlement; it also charged willful misapplication of funds. In United States v. Tamargo, 637 F. 2d 346 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 824, 102 S.Ct. 112, 70 L.Ed.2d 98 (1981), the court approved the trial court’s use of a jury instruction that stated that “misapplication of funds” for purposes of § 665 meant the conversion of funds to the defendant’s own use or the use of another. Id.…
• The Atchison v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 687 F.2d 912 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …ceivers from detaining a rail car for an unwarranted period of time. Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry., 271 U.S. 259, 262, 46 S.Ct. 530, 531, 70 L.Ed. 934 (1925); Monongahela Power Co. v. ICC, 640 F. 2d 504, 505 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 824, 102 S.Ct. 111, 70 L.Ed.2d 97 (1981). As the three-judge district court stated in Iversen v. United States, 63 F.Supp. 1001, 1005 (D.D.C.), aff’d per curiam, 327 U.S. 767, 66 S.Ct. 825, 90 L.Ed. 998 (1946): [Djemurrage charges are in part compensat…

  ← 1 / 2 →