HART

v.

MONTANA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Williams, 737 F.2d 594 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …silence, or changes in positions.” United States v. Dennis, 625 F. 2d 782, 795 (8th Cir.1980). In addition, a purported change in memory can produce “inconsistent” answers. See United States v. Distler, 671 F. 2d 954, 958 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 827, 102 S.Ct. 118, 70 L.Ed.2d 102 (1981). Particularly in a case of manifest reluctance to testify, see United States v. Thompson, 708 F. 2d 1294, 1302 (8th Cir.1983), “if a witness has testified to [certain] facts before a grand jury and forgets ...…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Davis-Watkins Co. v. Serv. Merchandise, 686 F.2d 1190 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …l, Inc. v. Dukane Corp., 669 F. 2d 404, 410-411 (6th Cir. 1982); see also, A. H. Cox & Co. v. Star Machinery Co., 653 F. 2d 1302, 1307 (9th Cir. 1981); Red Diamond Supply, Inc. v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 637 F. 2d 1001, 1004 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 827, 102 S.Ct. 119, 70 L.Ed.2d 102 (1981).10 IV. The district court dismissed SMC’s per se claims of group boycott, price stabilization and horizontal market divisions via summary judgment on the basis that SMC did not demonstrate the existence of hor…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Hornsby OIL Co., Inc. v. Champion Spark Plug Co., Inc., 714 F.2d 1384 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …ter. See Mendelovitz; Sports Center, Inc. v. Riddell, Inc., 673 F. 2d 786 (5th Cir.1982); Muenster Butane, Inc. v. Stewart Co., 651 F. 2d 292 (5th Cir.1981); Red Diamond Supply, Inc. v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 637 F. 2d 1001 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 827, 102 S.Ct. 119, 70 L.Ed.2d 102 (1981). We must therefore assess the legality of the restraint complained of under the guidon of the rule of reason.6 The rule of reason inquiry focuses on the competitive significance of a particular restraint, to be…