REED

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Richardson v. United States, 468 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1984)
  …ther Circuits that have considered the question have reached the same conclusion as the Court of Appeals in this case. See United States v. Ellis, 646 F. 2d 132, 135 (CA4 1981); United States v. Becton, 632 F. 2d 1294, 1297 (CA5 1980), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 837 (1981). Of course, a trial court’s finding of insufficient evidence also is the equivalent of an acquittal, see Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U. S. 40, 44-45, n. 5 (1981), but Burks was not necessary to establish that principle. See Burks v. United Stat…
• United States v. Shackleford, 738 F.2d 776 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …ment can be easily distinguished from this case. In each of the government’s cases the courts could find harmless error because the government's other evidence was overwhelming. See United States v. Reed, 647 F. 2d 678, 687 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837, 1037, 102 S.Ct. 142, 580, 70 L.Ed.2d 118, 483 (1981) ("overwhelming strength of government’s case"; other evidence properly admitted "was exceptionally conclusive"); United States v. Bosch, 584 F. 2d 1113, 1118 (1st Cir.1978) (government’s other ev…
• United States v. Warner, 690 F.2d 545 (6th Cir. 1982)
  ….Ct. 1238, 59 L.Ed.2d 468 (1979). The defendant must make a showing of compelling prejudice before the trial court’s ruling denying a Rule 14 severance will be disturbed. See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 647 F. 2d 678, 689 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837, 102 S.Ct. 142, 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Bright, 630 F. 2d 804, 813 (5th Cir. 1980). Warner argues that he was prejudiced by the “spillover” effect of evidence against his three codefendants concerning transactions in which he was no…