MUKA

v.

COHN ET AL.; AND MUKA V. FOLEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …Like a wide array of other phenomena, telephone calls may be authenticated by exclusively circumstantial evidence. See United States v. Drougas, 748 F. 2d 8, 26 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Espinoza, 641 F. 2d 153, 170 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841, 102 S.Ct. 153, 70 L.Ed.2d 125 (1981); United States v. Alper, 449 F. 2d 1223, 1229 (3d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 1605, 31 L.Ed.2d 822 (1972). See also Puerta Restrepo, 814 F. 2d at 1239. In this instance, the prosecution pres…
• United States v. Miller, 771 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …uling. See United States v. Espinoza, 641 F. 2d 153, 172 (4th Cir.) (identity of caller established by evidence that he made a reply or response in a manner expected to be evoked by an earlier communication made to him by the witness), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841, 102 S.Ct. 153, 70 L.Ed.2d 125 (1981); United States v. John, 518 F. 2d 705, 709-10 (7th Cir.1975) (context and timing of telephone call provided sufficient authenticating foundation for its admission); United States v. Lococo, 450 F. 2d 1196, 1199-…
• Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …erials. He could have issued the warrant on the basis of the affidavit alone. Instead, he investigated a representative sample of the materials presented to him. United States v. Espino [*573] za, 641 F. 2d 153, 162-64 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841, 102 S.Ct. 153, 70 L.Ed.2d 125 (1981); United States v. Thomas, 613 F. 2d 787, 790 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888, 101 S.Ct. 245, 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980). United States v. Middleton, 599 F. 2d 1349 (5th Cir. 1979). In this case, as in Mid…