GERMANY

v.

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Thomas v. Zant, 697 F.2d 977 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …state proceeding. . We need not reach the issue governed by Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 539, 101 S.Ct. 764, 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981). See also In re Wainwright, 678 F. 2d 951 (11th Cir.1982); Germany v. Estelle, 639 F. 2d 1301 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 850, 102 S.Ct. 290, 70 L.Ed.2d 140 (1981). The Mata analysis is not triggered unless a habeas petitioner is unable to come within one of the first seven categories of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). In Mata, itself, the factual record was complete, 449 U.S. at 5…
• United States v. Roper, 681 F.2d 1354 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …have been in controversy. Under these facts, if the admission of Roper’s statement violated the precepts of the Miranda decision, such an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See Germany v. Estelle, 639 F. 2d 1301 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 850, 102 S.Ct. 290, 70 L.Ed.2d 140 (1981); Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F. 2d 870 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860, 101 S.Ct. 161, 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980). All the appellants contend that the trial court erred in admitting co-conspirators’ hea…
• United States v. Snider, 720 F.2d 985 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …e independent evidence of a conspiracy. Coconspirator statements are admissible even if no conspiracy is charged. United States v. Scavo, 593 F. 2d 837, 845 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Miller, 644 F. 2d 1241, 1244 n. 5 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 850, 102 S.Ct. 289, 70 L.Ed.2d 140 (1981). When conspiracy is charged, statements made by coconspirators which are outside the scope of the conspiracy charged may be admissible. United States v. Green, 600 F. 2d 154, 157 (8th Cir.1979). Thus, our revers…