WOODROW EDWARDS
v.
STATE
WOODROW EDWARDS
STATE
211 So. 2d 210
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 199 So.2d 795.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lennie L. Humphries, 215 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Kincaid, 199 So. 2d 770 (Fla.App.), cert. dismissed, 211 So. 2d 210 (Fla.1968), and Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 207 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1968). WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.…
-
Hughes v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 294 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…sed upon the facts of injury and expenditures without regard to fault. This Court had occasion to consider the divisibility of insurance coverages in Phoenix Insurance Company v. Kincaid, Fla. App. 1st 1967, 199 So. 2d 770; certiorari denied, Fla., 211 So. 2d 210. In that case the Court was not involved with a consideration of a dichotomy relative to uninsured motorist’s coverage and “no-fault coverage”, but the reasoning and applicable law are the same. In that case, Chief Judge Rawls, speaking for the cour…
-
Longman v. Travelers Ins. Co., 371 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…injury without regard to fault. As stated in an excerpt from Hughes, supra, at 400, referring to the proposition espoused in the same court’s earlier holding in Phoenix Insurance Company v. Kincaid, 199 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 211 So. 2d 210: “The bodily injury and property damage coverages are activated by the negligence of those insured under the provisions of the policy while operating an insured automobile . The medical payment coverage is a distinct type of separate coverage in th…
Authorities Cited
- Edwards v. State, 199 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)