KEMLON PRODUCTS & DEVELOPMENT CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Mrs. Susie Lite Morrison v. City OF Baton Rouge, 761 F.2d 242 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …is not briefed; we shall not consider it. See, e.g., Bray v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Prgrams, 664 F. 2d 1045, 1048-49 (5th Cir.1981); Kemlon Products & Development Co. v. United States, 646 F. 2d 223, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 863, 102 S.Ct. 320, 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981). In reviewing the propriety of a dismissal on the pleadings, we of course accept the truth of the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations. See, e.g., Dickens v. Lewis, 750 F. 2d 1251, 1254 (5th Cir.1984). We are…
• Grove v. Mead Sch. Dist. NO. 354, 753 F.2d 1528 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …consin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972). As a parent, Grove has a direct, personal right to direct Cassie’s religious training. Collins v. Chandler Unified School District, 644 F. 2d 759, 764 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 863, 102 S.Ct. 322, 70 L.Ed.2d 163 (1981). The Riddles present no claim of violation of a personal right of religious freedom. In the complaint, their only interest is iden [*1532] tified as their taxpayer status. Appellants assert that the Riddles are…
• United States & Internal Revenue Serv. Special Agent Michael O. Hanson v. Tex. Heart Inst. & Greg C. Waddill, 755 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …(2) if so, the district court must further determine whether the IRS is authorized to disclose the information under section 6103(k)(6). See, e.g., Kemlon Products and Development Co. v. United States, 638 F. 2d 1315, 1323 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 863, 102 S.Ct. 320, 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981). The district court’s concern regarding an abuse of process is reached only if it concludes that disclosure by the IRS is not authorized. This Court reiterates that even if the past disclosure was improper, the…