WAKEFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1981-10-05
No. 81-214
454 U.S. 866 Supreme Court of the United States (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Khoury, 901 F.2d 948 (11th Cir. 1990)
    …4 n. 1 (8th Cir.1972); United States v. Prince, 456 F. 2d 1070, 1070-71 (5th Cir.1972); but cf. United States v. Taylor, 648 F. 2d 565, 573 (9th Cir.) (non-jurisdictional rule of forbearance with extraordinary circumstances exception), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866, 102 S.Ct. 329, 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981). Accordingly, we dismiss this claim without prejudice to West’s remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.20 X. DEA-6 BRADY MATERIAL The government’s star coconspirator witness, sharing the marquee with Candeda, was the…
  • United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
    …lites’ involved in the distribution scheme and the determination of the dimensions of an extensive drug conspiracy have been held to justify the use of electronic surveillance.” United States v. Johnson, 645 F. 2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866, 102 S.Ct. 329, 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981). We conclude that the Flores wiretap was authorized in accordance with the pertinent statutory requirements. E. Alleged Grand Jury Irregularities. On the day trial began, Coffie moved that the district court…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw