SOLMITZ, BY SOLMITZ, GUARDIAN AD LITEM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984)
  …and Bundy’s arrest. How [*347] ever, the courts have held that the mere existence of pre-indictment publicity is insufficient to show that grand jurors might be prejudiced or biased. United States v. Civella, 648 F. 2d 1167 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 867, 102 S.Ct. 330, 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981); Khaalis v. United States, 408 A. 2d 313 (D.C.App.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1092, 100 S.Ct. 1059, 62 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980). To justify the individual examination of grand jurors the pre-in-dictment publicity…
• Fischer v. State, 429 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …7 (1935); State v. Bindyke, 288 N.C. 608, 220 S.E. 2d 521 (1975); Brigman v. State, 350 P. 2d 321 (Okl.Cr.App.1960); Commonwealth v. Krick, 164 Pa.Super. 516, 67 A. 2d 746 (1949). But see Johnson v. Duckworth, 650 F. 2d 122 (7th Cir.); cert. denied, 454 U.S. 867, 102 S.Ct. 332, 70 L.Ed.2d 169 (1981) (alternate’s mere presence during jury deliberations did not deny appellants a fair trial); Potter v. Perini, 545 F. 2d 1048 (6th Cir.1976) (same). For a case specifically addressing the situation of the “seven…
• Sprowls v. State, 433 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …e search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution. We adopt the reasoning of United States v. Viera, 644 F. 2d 509 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 867, 102 S.Ct. 332, 70 L.Ed.2d 169 (1981) in recognizing that this type of investigative procedure is such a de minimis intrusion as not to constitute a search and seizure within the respective constitutional prohibitions. The judgment of conviction an…

  ← 1 / 2 →