LEVY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …go to the beach. In sum, we conclude that “the trier of fact would have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt with the additional evidence inserted.” United States v. Lay, 644 F. 2d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 869, 102 S.Ct. 336, 70 L.Ed.2d 172 (1981). H. Jury Instructions. Several appellants claim error in a number of the district court’s jury instructions. Before turning to their specific claims, we consider the principles governing our review. It is a “w…
• United States v. Lankford, 955 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …rontation Clause violations are subject to harmless error. See Arizona v. Fulminante, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991). The Fifth Circuit in United States v. Lay, 644 F. 2d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. Unit A, May 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 869, 102 S.Ct. 336, 70 L.Ed.2d 172 (1981), stated that “where the trial judge erroneously excluded evidence, [the court] must first determine what the evidence .would have been and then determine whether the trier of fact would have-found the defendant…
• United States v. Leslie, 759 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …316, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1110, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); United States v. Andrew, 666 F. 2d 915, 924 (5th Cir.1982), or by introducing extrinsic evidence demonstrating the witness’s bias. United States v. Lay, 644 F. 2d 1087, 1090 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 869, 102 S.Ct. 336, 70 L.Ed.2d 172 (1981); Diecidue, 603 F. 2d at 550. The district court has broad discretion in determining how bias may be proved and what extrinsic evidence is material to that purpose. The district court’s judgment will be disturbed…