LUSANE

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Mealy, 851 F.2d 890 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …n the judge’s discretion to direct the jury to reread the original instructions rather than giving the jury the dictionary definition of “between” as the defendants had requested. United States v. Lang, 644 F. 2d 1232, 1239 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 870, 102 S.Ct. 338, 70 L.Ed.2d 174 (1981). Thus, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in referring the jury to the original instructions which correctly and clearly stated the law. See supra note 5 (quoting the relevant jury instruction).…
• United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …oting that the grand jury remains a creature of statute, at least in the provisions for its governance.... In the present case, Rule 6 provides the applicable statutory standard.” United States v. Lang, 644 F. 2d 1232, 1235 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 870, 102 S.Ct. 338, 70 L.Ed.2d 174 (1981). Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(g) provides: “At any time for cause shown the court may excuse a juror either temporarily or permanently, and in the latter event the court may impanel another person in place of the juror excus…
• United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …a fide defense or made an unreasoned decision. Cf. United States v. Brown, 739 F. 2d 1136, 1144-45 & n. 7 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 331, 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); United States v. Lang, 644 F. 2d 1232, 1240 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 870, 102 S.Ct. 338, 70 L.Ed.2d 174 (1981). Marshall has filed an additional brief pro se. This brief asserts that “[ojver my protestations, based on his misunderstanding of the law, [trial counsel] simply wouldn’t allow me to take the stand.” A defenda…

  ← 1 / 2 →