MORALES

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• In the Interest of D.M., 616 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …ld”); In re Hanks, 553 A. 2d 1171 (Del.1989) (where the parent fails to “plan adequately for the child’s needs”); Chandler v. Cochran, 247 Ga. 184, 275 S.E. 2d 23 (where parent fails to “provide for the care and support of the child”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 872, 102 S.Ct. 342, 70 L.Ed.2d 177 (1981); In re Male [*1194] Child, 8 Haw.App. 66, 793 P. 2d 669 (where parents are unable to provide “the care necessary for the well being of the child”), cert. denied, 71 Haw. 668, 833 P. 2d 900 (1990); People v. D.A.…
• Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, 731 F.2d 568 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …o no relief, the district court did not err in denying Hill’s petition without an evidentiary hearing. A hearing is not required where the issues can be resolved on the basis of the record. Lindner v. Wyrick, 644 F. 2d 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 872, 102 S.Ct. 345, 70 L.Ed.2d 178 (1981). This Court has found that the Arkansas guilty [*573] plea procedures would require a hearing only in the most extraordinary circumstances. Pennington v. Housewright, supra, 666 F. 2d at 331. See also Blackledge…
• Gilmore v. Armontrout, 861 F.2d 1061 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …e Court Rule 27.26 that a successive motion to vacate a sentence shall not be entertained when the grounds presented therein could have been raised in the original Rule 27.26 motion. Lindner v. Wyrick, 644 F. 2d 724, 726-27 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 872, 102 S.Ct. 345, 70 L.Ed.2d 178 (1981). Because Gilmore advanced his claim concerning the prosecuting attorney’s closing argument in his original Rule 27.26 motion, the record clearly indicates that the claim was available to him when the motion was…