SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES
SMITH
UNITED STATES
454 U.S. 875
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (27 total)
-
United States v. Murad Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987)…ed of criminal activity” (emphasis added). Our court has held that “the proper standard for judging the constitutionality of a search is a totally objective one.” United States v. Smith, 643 F. 2d 942, 944 (2d Cir.) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875, 102 S.Ct. 350, 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981). Applying an objective standard, courts have frequently discounted the subjective intent or motivations of searching officers. Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128, 138, 98 S.Ct. 1717, 1723, 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (197…
-
Gates v. Zant, 863 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1989)…e also United States v. Williams, 809 F. 2d 75, 83-86 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 1959, 2469, 2484, 95 L.Ed.2d 531, 877, 96 L.Ed.2d 377 (1987); United States v. Robinson, 645 F. 2d 616, 617-18 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875, 102 S.Ct. 351, 70 L.Ed.2d 182 (1981). In these latter cases, the courts generally have held that the defendant must make some showing of actual prejudice before a retrial is required. Thus, the case law in this area presents two ends of a spectr…
-
United States v. James ("Jake") Rohrer, 708 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1983)…rt of the agreement. There can be no doubt but that the agreement was relevant to material facts at issue and that the court acted correctly in permitting it to be introduced. See United States v. Rubier, 651 F. 2d 628, 630 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 875, 102 S.Ct. 351, 70 L.Ed.2d 183 (1981). And it was proper for the government to point to the cooperation agreement as a factor bearing on Green’s credibility. See United States v. Brooklier, 685 F. 2d 1208, 1218-19 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied,-U.S…
Previewing 3 of 27 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence