GENERAL ATOMIC CO.

v.

UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (TWO CASES)

Citator

Cited By (53 total)

• Proprietors Ins. Co. v. West, 435 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …oci would nevertheless prevail since, in such a legal dogfall, there is no state with a clearly “greater” interest than the place of injury. In re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois on May 25, 1979, 644 F. 2d 594 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878, 102 S.Ct. 358, 70 L.Ed.2d 187 (1981); Bing v. Halstead, 495 F.Supp. 517, 520 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (“Since the interest analysis does not point clearly to the law of any jurisdiction, the law of the place where the tort occurred prevails.”). I place thes…
• Kremer v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1982)
  …hat Chemico had discriminated against him. Res judicata has recently been taken to bar claims arising from the same transaction even if brought under different statutes, Nash County Bd. of Ed. v. Biltmore Co., 640 F. 2d 484, 488 (CA4), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 878 (1981). See also Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 61(1) (Tent. Draft No. 5, Mar. 10,1978); Currie, Res Judicata: The Neglected Defense, 45 U. Chi. L. Rev. 317, 340-341 (1978). It may be that petitioner would be precluded under res judicata from…
• Marrese v. Am. Acad. of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1985)
  …fect^ a “full and fair opportunity” to litigate his rights under the federal statute. Cf. Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board of Realtors, 724 F. 2d 1347 (CA9 1983); Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co., 640 F. 2d 484 (CA4), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 878 (1981). The Court will eventually have to face these questions; I would resolve them now. E. g., by inquiring whether the plaintiff could have raised the question whether the defendant violated a particular statute. E. g., by inquiring whether th…

  ← 1 / 2 →