WITT ET AL.

v.

HARBOUR, SHERIFF, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. State, 424 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …[*29] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Richards, 388 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), petition for review denied mem., 397 So. 2d 778 (Fla.), cert. denied mem., 454 U.S. 879, 102 S.Ct. 359, 70 L.Ed.2d 188 (1981).…
• ANR Pipeline Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 771 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  …oof burden under section 4. Assignment of the burden of proof under these sections is not a novel question in this court; we ruled on the issue definitively in Public Service Commission v. FERC, 642 F. 2d 1335 (D.C.Cir.1980) (Transco), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879, 102 S.Ct. 360, 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981). The essential features of the three substantive Commission determinations that petitioners challenge are summarized below. Change in Zone Boundaries — For the purpose of setting transportation components of t…
• Off. OF Consumers' Counsel v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 783 F.2d 206 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …ices are unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential. See, e.g., Mississippi Valley Gas Co. v. FERC, 659 F. 2d 488, 503 (5th Cir.1981); Public Service Comm'n of New York v. FERC, 642 F. 2d 1335, 1346-48 (D.C.Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879, 102 S.Ct. 360, 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981). Here, where the protestors allege the violation, they carry the burden of proof. . Pipeline contracts were on file with the Commission in challenged PGA proceedings, but in each case the pipeline contended t…