ISAAC EDELSTEIN, A/K/A JIM EDELSTEIN, APPELLANT,
v.
NATHAN MEDOW AND FRANCES MEDOW, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the breach of contract and the determination of damages.
The defendant appealed a damages judgment rendered against them in a breach of contract action for the sale of real estate. A prior related case addre…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Real Estate Transactions cases and more on FLexlaw
This appeal is by the defendant below, against whom a judgment for damages was rendered in an action for breach of a contract for sale of certain real estate.
The factual background is sufficiently disclosed in the opinion of this court in Edelstein v. Wilder, Fla.App.1967,198 So.2d 665, in which we affirmed a judgment obtained by a broker in his action against the seller for a commission arising out of the transaction.
On the present appeal reversal is sought on three grounds or contentions. We reject, as without merit, the first two of the appellant’s contentions, on the authority of Edelstein v. Wilder, supra.
The third contention .of the appellant challenges the correctness of the finding of the trial court as to the value of the property, on the basis of which the amount of damages was determined. Upon reviewing the record with relation to this aspect of the case we observe no reason to disturb the judgment of the trial court. Expert witnesses were produced by both sides with reference to the value of the property, and the finding of the trial court as to value was within the range of their testimony.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Headley v. Baron, 228 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1969)…THORNAL, Justice. We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal accompanied by a certificate that the question passed upon is one of great public interest. Fla.Const. art. V, § 4, F.S.A.; Headley v. Baron, 211 So. 2d 223 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). Our problem involves the extent of immunity granted by Fla.Stat. § 932.29, F.S.A. (1965), when a city police officer is subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury. Respondent Baron was a police officer of the City of Miam…
-
Headley v. Baron, 228 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…PER CURIAM. WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on May 28, 1968 (211 So. 2d 223) affirming the final judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County in the above styled cause; and WHEREAS, on review of this court s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinions and judgments filed July 16, 1969 and November…
-
Reese v. Baron, 256 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…he board submitted a communication to the City Manager of Miami informing him that Baron was found not guilty of the charges. [*72] The first appeal in a matter concerning the dismissal of Officer Baron is reported in Headley v. Baron, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 223. That appeal was from a final judgment in mandamus entered upon the petition of Officer Baron. The petition was filed June 26, 1959. The trial judge ordered Walter Headley as Chief of Police of the City of Miami to reinstate Glenn Baron to his forme…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Edelstein v. Wilder, 198 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)