INMAN ET AL.

v.

BROCK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brook Vill. N. Assocs. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 686 F.2d 66 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …opriate eases to apply the sanction of Rule 36 to material facts that conclusively establish or preclude a party’s claim. See, e.g., Rainbolt v. Johnson, 669 F. 2d 767 (D.C.Cir.1981); United States v. Kenealy, 646 F. 2d 699 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 941, 102 S.Ct. 478, 70 L.Ed.2d 250 (1981). The instant case poses the question of the discretion of a district court to permit withdrawal or amendment of an admission by default once trial has commenced. In general, the standard for being relieved of a…
• Stevens Tech. Servs., Inc. v. SS Brooklyn, 885 F.2d 584 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …l, but also has the option of bringing an in personam action against any party who is directly liable in contract. Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical v. Franconia Sea Transport, Ltd., 504 F.Supp. 579, 581 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd 659 F. 2d 1058, cert. denied, 454 U.S. 941, 102 S.Ct. 478, 70 L.Ed.2d 249 (1981). A shipowner may be such a party. Id. Federal maritime law embraces the principles of the law of agency. Kirno Hill Corp. v. Holt, 618 F. 2d 982, 985 (2d Cir.1980); Port Ship Serv., Inc. v. International Ship M…
• Port Ship Serv., Inc. v. Int'l Ship Mgmt. & Agencies Serv., Inc., 800 F.2d 1418 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …ritime creditor may choose either remedy if that remedy is available under the substantive law. Dowell Division of Dow Chemical Co. v. Franconia Sea Transport, Ltd., 504 F.Supp. 579, 581 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 659 F. 2d 1058 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 941, 102 S.Ct. 478, 70 L.Ed.2d 249 (1981). Consequently, the potential availability of maritime liens in these cases does not preclude these in personam actions. C. Since the vessel is not the principal, Astral and International Ship did not disclose…