TEXAS

v.

GREEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1985)
  …e of the notebook. The government further contends that admission of photocopies of the notebook’s contents was proper under FRE 1003 and 1001(4). We agree that under the authority of United States v. Crouch, 648 F. 2d 932 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 952, 102 S.Ct. 491, 70 L.Ed.2d 259 (1981), the seizure of the notebook was justified by the plain view exception and that photocopies of the contents of such were admissible. Upon such a finding, we need not decide whether Cheek had a protectable privac…
• United States v. Christine, 687 F.2d 749 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …ances it may be possible that the seizure of evidence not described in the warrant nevertheless may be justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement. See, e.g., United States v. Crouch, 648 F. 2d 932 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 952, 102 S.Ct. 491, 70 L.Ed.2d 259 (1981); United States v. Ochs, 595 F. 2d 1247 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 955 (1979). See also United States v. Scarfo, 685 F. 2d 842 (3d Cir. 1982) (Gibbons, J., dissenting). , See Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York…
• United States v. Issacs, 708 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …vidence. See Hillyard, 677 F. 2d at 1342. We do not mean to suggest that agents entitled to examine a book or similar item may minutely scrutinize its contents, especially when personal, nonbusiness papers are involved. See Crouch v. United States, 454 U.S. 952, 955-56, 102 S.Ct. 491, 492-93, 70 L.Ed.2d 259 (1981) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). But this case does not require us to explore the limits to brief perusal. The trial court’s factual findings establish that no more than a glanc…