BOOKER

v.

FLORIDA; FUNCHESS V. FLORIDA; BARFIELD V. NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Hardwick v. State, 521 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1988)
  …testimony was unreliable and irrelevant, and therefore hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to exclude. See Welty v. State, 402 So. 2d 1159, 1162-63 (Fla.1981); Booker v. State, 397 So. 2d 910, 914-15 [*1074] (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 957, 102 S.Ct. 493, 70 L.Ed.2d 261 (1981). As his second issue, Hardwick argues that the trial court improperly refused to let him represent himself in violation of Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). The trial co…
• Lightbourne v. State, 438 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1983)
  …on, as well as against assertions that they constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Proffitt v. Florida; Spinkellink v. Wainwright; Ferguson v. State, 417 So. 2d 639 (Fla.1982); Songer v. State, Booker v. State, 397 So. 2d 910 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 957, 102 S.Ct. 493, 70 L.Ed.2d 261 (1981); Antone v. State; Foster v. State; Martin v. State, 377 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1979); Cooper v. State, 336 So. 2d 1133 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 925, 97 S.Ct. 2200, 53 L.Ed.2d 239 (1977); Alford v. State, 307…
• Blanco v. State, 452 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 1984)
  …pon which the admission of evidence of the robbery would have tended to exculpate him. A trial judge’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion. Booker v. State, 397 So. 2d 910 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 957, 102 S.Ct. 493, 70 L.Ed.2d 261 (1981). The test of admissibility is relevancy. Johnson v. State, 130 So. 2d 599 (Fla.1961). To be admissible, evidence must be both logically and legally relevant. Wolf v. State, 72 Fla. 572, 73 So. 740 (1917). Appel…

Authorities Cited

• Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)