LEPPO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Marrinson, 832 F.2d 1465 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …n similar to the present case, the due date, not the actual date of filing, controlled the running of the statute. 523 F. 2d 848, 849-51 (3d Cir.1975). Accord United States v. Akmakjian, 647 F. 2d 12, 13 n. 2 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 964, 102 S.Ct. 505, 70 L.Ed.2d 380 (1981). The defendant’s arguments to the contrary are to no avail. General statements that “criminal statutes of limitation are to be liberally interpreted in favor of repose,” United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307,…
• Woods v. Evansville Press Co., Inc., 791 F.2d 480 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …If the court concludes, therefore, that no reasonable jury could find actual malice with convincing clarity, the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accord Rebozo v. Washington Post Co., 637 F. 2d 375, 381 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 964, 102 S.Ct. 505, 70 L.Ed.2d 379 (1981); Yiamouyiannis, supra, 619 F. 2d at 940 (citation omitted); contra Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Anderson, 746 F. 2d 1563, 1570-71 (D.C.Cir. 1984), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2672, 86 L.Ed.2d 691 (1985) (reject…