MODIN

v.

NEW YORK CENTRAL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Morast v. Lance, 807 F.2d 926 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …regulations, national banks are not so much the “instrumentalities” of the federal government that its officers are agents of the federal government. See Canlis v. San Joaquin Sheriffs Posse Comitatus, 641 F. 2d 711, 717-18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 967, 102 S.Ct. 510, 70 L.Ed.2d 383 (1981).3 2. Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) Section 1985(2) prohibits, in relevant part, the following conspiracies: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or th…
• Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …ecause § 1985(1) is legislation specifically authorizing suit by injured federal officers. See Canlis v. San Joaquin Sheriff’s Posse Comitatus, 641 F. 2d 711 (9th Cir.) (holding § 1985(l)’s protections extend only to federal officers), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 967, 102 S.Ct. 510, 70 L.Ed.2d 383 (1981). In the face of such an express statutory claim, we need not consider Bivens’ “special factors counseling hesitation.” Nevertheless, the rationale of Chappell and Feres guides our decision that military officers…
• Scott v. Moore, 680 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …96 supra. . Canlis v. San Joaquin Sheriff’s Posse Comitatus, 641 F. 2d 711, 720-21 (9th Cir.) (“The law of this circuit is clear: the plaintiff must be a member of the class discriminated against to claim the benefits of § 1985(3).”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 967, 102 S.Ct. 510, 70 L.Ed.2d 383 (1981); Briley v. California, 564 F. 2d 849, 858-59 (9th Cir. 1977); Lopez v. Arrowhead Ranches, 523 F. 2d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 1975). . Novotny, a male, was a loan officer and member of the Savings and Loan Association…