MATTHEW ET AL.

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Rocco Messina and Charles J. Arico v. United States, 728 F.2d 77 (2d Cir. 1984)
• United States v. Leitner, 784 F.2d 159 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …nces have been found when a prisoner needed to be free to pursue his civil case, Mitchell, or when the prisoner was a juvenile and there were no suitable holding facilities for him. Hu Yau-Leung v. Soscia, 649 F. 2d 914, 920 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 971, 102 S.Ct. 519, 70 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981). The courts continue to hold that there is a presumption against bail in extradition cases, and that bail can be granted only in “special circumstances,” see id. at 920; United States v. Williams, 611 F. 2d 91…
• In re Extradition OF Robert Henry Russell. United States v. Russell, 805 F.2d 1215 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …indings. Bail Bail should be denied in extradition proceedings absent “special circumstances.” See Wright v. Henkel, 190 U.S. 40, 62-63, 23 S.Ct. 781, 786-87, 47 L.Ed. 948 (1903); Ha Yau-Leung v. Soscia, 649 F. 2d 914, 920 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 971, 102 S.Ct. 519, 70 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981); United States v. Williams, 611 F. 2d 914, 915 (1st Cir.1979). “Unlike the situation for domestic crimes, there is no presumption favoring bail. The reverse is rather the case.” Beaulieu v. Hartigan, 554 F. 2d 1…