BISCAYNE FURNITURE MFG. CO. ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
NICHOLAS FABREGAS ET AL., RESPONDENTS
BISCAYNE FURNITURE MFG. CO. ET AL., PETITIONERS,
NICHOLAS FABREGAS ET AL., RESPONDENTS
211 So. 2d 562
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. The motion for respondents’ attorney’s fee is granted in the sum of $250.00.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robbin v. Gray Brewer, 236 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…ggestion for a writ of prohibition in the Supreme Court of the State of Florida for the purpose of reviewing the order of October 4, 1967. The Supreme Court by sua sponte order dated June 5, 1968, dismissed the petition. Robbin v. Carlton, Fla.1968, 211 So. 2d 562. Thereafter the plaintiff filed complaint in the lower court seeking declaratory relief. The defendant filed motion to dismiss. The lower court after hearing argument and requiring memorandums of law entered its final judgment for the defendant, in…