CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. ET AL.

v.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Chase Manhattan Bank v. E.B. Rood, 698 F.2d 435 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …) (Unit B). Nevertheless, because the parties rely upon Florida law, we presume its applicability. See Southern Stone Co., 665 F. 2d at 701; N.K. Parrish, Inc. v. Southwest Beef Industries Corp., 638 F. 2d 1366, 1370 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047, 102 S.Ct. 587, 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981). Smith v. New York Life Insurance Co., 579 F. 2d 1267, 1270 n. 5 (5th Cir.1978). . The agreement at issue in that case read, [i]n the event of failure on the part of The Trade Winds Enterprises Corporation to…
• Utah Power & Light Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 747 F.2d 721 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …te obligation to scrutinize the Commission’s action for evidence of compliance with the law, for support in the record, and for reasoned decision making. See, e.g., Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F. 2d 642, 647 & n. 12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047, 102 S.Ct. 587, 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981). The scope of our review of the ICC’s decisions under its Staggers Act section 11501(c) jurisdiction is defined by the above-stated standards. Congress envisioned section 11051(c) as providing both for federal…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Consol. Rail Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 685 F.2d 687 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …cisions, Radioactive Materials, Special Train Service, 359 ICC 70 (1978), and Trainload Rates on Radioactive Materials, Eastern Railroads, 362 ICC 756 (1980), aff’d sub nom. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F. 2d 642 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047, 102 S.Ct. 587, 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981), the ICC and this court held that the railroads could not require special trains as a safety measure in their tariffs for radioactive materials because the Department of Transportation and the Nuclear Regulatory…

  ← 1 / 2 →