ROBERT LEE SEWARD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Perlman v. State, 269 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
  …erty for gambling purposes. It is the maintenance or keeping of a place for gambling purposes. In other words, the statute does not reach the gambling or the gamblers. Stanger v. State, Fla.App.1960, 117 So. 2d 417 and State v. Schell, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 581, 582. Bingo has been recognized as gambling within the purview of Section 849.01, F.S.1969, F.S.A. Creash v. State, supra. Section 849.093, enacted in 1967, removes bingo from the entire chapter (Ch. 849) dealing with gambling, provided the bingo i…
• State v. Tate, 420 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
  …sts of certain specific acts distinguishing this form of gambling from every other form of gambling. People v. Laude, 81 Misc. 256, 143 N.Y.S. 156 (N.Y.Cty.Ct.1913). This court has held that bookmaking is a specific act of gambling. State v. Schell, 211 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). The supreme court has defined bookmaking as “making book.” King v. State, 104 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1958). The underlying idea of bookmaking is participation in gambling as a moneymaking pursuit. Bookmakers prepare a list with the odd…
• Alfie Mart v. State, 350 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …0). The thrust of the statute is not to proscribe gambling itself, but to condemn the maintenance or keeping of a house or room designed for people to assemble and gamble therein. Perlman v. State, 269 So. 2d 385 (Fla.4th DCA 1972); State v. Schell, 211 So. 2d 581 (Fla.2d DCA 1968); Stanger v. State, 117 So. 2d 417 (Fla.3d DCA 1960); State v. Hindle, 108 R.I. 389, 275 A. 2d 915 (1971); Gullatt v. State ex rel. Collins, 169 Ga. 538, 150 S.E. 825 (1929). Maintaining a room or house designed for people to gather…

Authorities Cited

• Polston v. State, 137 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)