LEONARD SANGESTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-06-11
No. 67-1093
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
211 So. 2d 585 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, tried by a jury and found guilty of robbery. *586He appeals the judgment and sentence, contending the state failed to prove that he aided and abetted in the crime charged. Upon consideration of that contention in the light of the record and briefs, we conclude otherwise. In our view the evidence adequately supports the verdict and judgment. See Mallory v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 69.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw