FLORIDA
v.
BROWN; DISTLER V. UNITED STATES; PRICHARD ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. LOUISIANA; MASON V. COUNTY OF WORCESTER ET AL.; ALERS ET UX. V. CITY GOVERNMENT OF SAN JUAN; CRENSHAW V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; COLE V. VINCENT ET AL.; SMITH V. KEET, JUDGE; MILLER V. WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.; HILLIARD V. WILKINSON ET AL.; BLANTON ET UX. V. GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION OF GEORGIA; BROUGHTON V. BROUGHTON; LEE V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ET AL.; KAVAJA V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1981-11-16
Nos. 80-1644; No. 80-1986; No. 80-2090; No. 80-6578; No. 80-6722; No. 80-6737; No. 80-6801; No. 80-6830; No. 80-6861; No. 80-6906; No. 80-6937; No. 81-104; No. 81-5003; No. 81-5197; No. 81-5269
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
454 U.S. 1069 Supreme Court of the United States (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gasset v. State, 490 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …mes, and I agree, that Gasset’s attached garage is a part of his home in which he had a reasonable expectation of privacy. See Brown v. State, 392 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819, 102 S.Ct. 98, 70 L.Ed.2d 89, reh'g denied, 454 U.S. 1069, 102 S.Ct. 619, 70 L.Ed.2d 604 (1981) (police violated Brown’s Fourth Amendment rights when they entered his enclosed yard and arrested him on his back porch); see also Payton (Fourth Amendment protects individual’s privacy when individual within un…
  • United States v. Augustin Alonso Lopez, 777 F.2d 543 (10th Cir. 1985)
    …missible discretion to the police in stopping vehicles along Interstate 40. We addressed this very argument in United States v. Prichard, 645 F. 2d 854 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 832, 102 S.Ct. 130, 70 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), reh’g denied, 454 U.S. 1069, 102 S.Ct. 620, 70 L.Ed.2d 605 (1981). There we said, “The purpose of the roadblock, i.e., to check drivers’ licenses and ear registrations, was a legitimate one. If, in the process of so doing, the officers saw evidence of other crimes, they had…
  • …exclusive jurisdiction simply because a suit for nonmonetary relief may form the basis for a later money judgment. See Better v. Middendorf, 632 F. 2d 788, 799 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905, 101 S.Ct. 3030, 69 L.Ed.2d 405, reh. denied, 454 U.S. 1069, 102 S.Ct. 621, 70 L.Ed.2d 605 (1981); Glines v. Wade, 586 F. 2d 675, 681 (9th Cir.1978). District Court jurisdiction in the present case thus supports the Congressional policy of liberalized judicial review animating the 1976 amendments to § 1331…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw