NEAL

v.

HARGREAVES, CIRCUIT JUDGE OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON

Citator

Cited By

• Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …ard v. King, 707 F. 2d 215 (5th Cir.1983) (per curiam); Kondrat v. Byron, 587 F.Supp. 994 (N.D.Ohio 1984). . In re Green, No. 81-1186 (5th Cir. Unit A Apr. 27, 1981) (appendix to Green v. Carlson, 649 F. 2d 285, 286 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1087, 102 S.Ct. 646, 70 L.Ed.2d 623 (1981)); Peck v. Hoff, 660 F. 2d 371 (8th Cir.1981) (per curiam); Green v. White, 616 F. 2d 1054 (8th Cir.1980) (per curiam). Several courts have held that a total ban on all IFP filings by a particular litigant as a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …ed to tolerate abuse of its open door. If one, or more, of the petitioners has been guilty of flagrant misuse of the judicial process the court may refuse to entertain further complaints. See Green v. Carlson, 649 F. 2d 285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1087, 102 S.Ct. 646, 70 L.Ed.2d 623 (1981); accord, Green v. Warden, 699 F. 2d 364 (7th Cir.1983); In re Green, 669 F. 2d 779 (D.C.Cir.1981); Green v. White, 616 F. 2d 1054 (8th Cir.1980). Nor does the fact that they have stated a cause of action mean t…
• Procup v. Strickland, 760 F.2d 1107 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …forma pauperis only claims alleging actual or threatened physical harm. E.g., In re Green, No. 81-1186 (5th Cir. Apr. 27, 1981) (Unit A) (published as appendix to the opinion in Green v. Carlson, 649 F. 2d 285, 286 (5th Cir.) (Unit A), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1087, 102 S.Ct. 646, 70 L.Ed.2d 623 (1981)); Green v. White, supra, 616 F. 2d at 1055. Imposing this type of injunction creates, in effect, a conclusive presumption that future in for-ma pauperis claims not involving actual or threatened physical harm ar…