BARDEN
v.
MAINE

U.S. | 1981-11-30
No. 81-5427
454 U.S. 1088 Supreme Court of the United States (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
    …ille and Davidson County, 461 U. S. 934 (1983); McDonald v. Draper, 459 U. S. 1112 (1983); McDonald v. Thompson, 456 U. S. 981 (1982); McDonald v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 455 U. S. 957 (1982); McDonald v. Tennessee, 454 U. S. 1088 (1981); McDonald v. Draper, 452 U. S. 965 (1981); McDonald v. Tennessee, 450 U. S. 983 (1981); McDonald v. Draper, 450 U. S. 983 (1981); McDonald v. Metropolitan Airport Authority, 450 U. S. 1002 (1981); McDonald v. Metropolitan Government of Nashvi…
  • United States v. Monaco, 702 F.2d 860 (11th Cir. 1983)
    …ment evidence, the test is “whether the jury had sufficient information to appraise the bias, motives and credibility of the witness.” 626 F. 2d at 1386 n. 34. See also United States ex. rel. Haywood v. Wolff, 658 F. 2d 455 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1088, 102 S.Ct. 649, 70 L.Ed.2d 625 (1981). [*871] In addition to being consistent with other prior testimony cases, our conclusion accords with the general rule that the testimony of a witness is admissible, even though the witness invoked the privilege…
  • United States v. Snyder, 872 F.2d 1351 (7th Cir. 1989)
    …i v. Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204, 213, 92 S.Ct. 2308, 2313, 33 L.Ed.2d 293 (1972); Dutton, 400 U.S. at 89, 91 S.Ct. at 219-20; Green, 399 U.S. at 161, 90 S.Ct. at 1936-37; United States ex rel. Haywood v. Wolff, 658 F. 2d 455, 460 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1088, 102 S.Ct. 649, 70 L.Ed.2d 625 (1981). See also Feldman, 761 F. 2d at 387 (“[S]tatements are [constitutionally] admissible even where there was no cross-examination if it is clear (1) that the declarant actually made the statement in question; and…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw