ZATKO

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Sanborn v. State, 474 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …d deliver his statement in narrative form; the defendant’s attorney does not elicit the perjurious testimony by questioning nor argue the false testimony during closing argument.3 See Coleman v. State, 621 P. 2d 869, 881 (Alaska 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1090, 102 S.Ct. 653, 70 L.Ed.2d 628 (1981); People v. Salquerro, 107 Misc.2d 155, 433 N.Y.S.2d 711, 714 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1980); State v. Covington, 279 S.C. 274, 305 S.E. 2d 578, 580 (1983). The attorney, of course, is not precluded from arguing sound, non-pe…
• United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …deprives this court of jurisdiction to entertain his substantive claims. The timely filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. Meggett v. Wainwright, 642 F. 2d 95, 96 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1090, 102 S.Ct. 653, 70 L.Ed.2d 628 (1981); Sanchez v. Board of Regents of Texas Southern University, 625 F. 2d 521, 522 n. 1 (5th Cir.1980).1 To perfect an appeal of a criminal conviction, the defendant must file a notice within ten days after the entry…
• Abdul Shah v. T.D. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir. 1983)
  ….1983); Brooks v. Britton, 669 F. 2d 665 (11th Cir.1982); Pettibone v. Cupp, 666 F. 2d 333 (9th Cir.1981); Mayfield v. United States Parole Commission, 647 F. 2d 1053 (10th Cir.1981); Meggett v. Wainwright, 642 F. 2d 95 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1090, 102 S.Ct. 653, 70 L.Ed.2d 628 (1981). We are bound by the language of the 1979 amendment and its requirement of a “motion filed” within the second thirty-day period at the latest. A bare notice of appeal should not be construed as a motion for [*1…