DOLOIR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Auto Transp., S.A., 763 F.2d 745 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …ce, the law of the case, whether right or wrong, applies. See Doe v. Marshall, 694 F. 2d 1038, 1041 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119, 103 S.Ct. 3087, 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983); Key v. Wise, 629 F. 2d 1049, 1055 n. 4 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1103, 102 S.Ct. 682, 70 L.Ed.2d 647 (1981); Schwartz v. NMS Industries, Inc., 575 F. 2d 553, 554 (5th Cir.1978). We have fully considered the contentions of Travelers and Sentry. We cannot say that any of the prior panel’s holdings is unprincipled or w…
• Kirshner v. Uniden Corp. OF Am., 842 F.2d 1074 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …itute law of the case); Key v. Wise, 629 F. 2d 1049, 1054-55 (5th Cir.1980) (second panel not bound by first panel’s denial of petition for writ of mandamus raising same issue, where first panel provided no explanation for its ruling), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1103, 102 S.Ct. 682, 70 L.Ed.2d 647 (1981); 18 Wright § 4478 at 798 (“Rulings that simply deny extraordinary relief for want of a clear and strong showing on the merits, ... [*1079] do not trigger law of the case consequences.”) (footnote omitted). Deni…
• United States v. Shirley, 884 F.2d 1130 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …mandamus, the law of the case doctrine precludes relitigation of this issue. The government’s argument is without merit, as the panel denied the petition without opinion. See, e.g., Key v. Wise, 629 F. 2d 1049, 1054-55 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1103, 102 S.Ct. 682, 70 L.Ed.2d 647 (1981) (law of the case doctrine does not preclude examination of issue when a prior panel denied a petition for writ of mandamus since the denial could have been predicated on the fact that the party had an adequate r…