NASH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
v.
BILTMORE CO. ET AL.; LOCHIATTO ET AL. V. FLORIDA; COOK ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES; CAMPBELL V. WASHINGTON ET AL.; RADIO BROADCASTING CO. V. FRANKLIN TOWN CORP. ET AL.; NICHOLLS V. NASH ET AL.; DEFALCO V. UNITED STATES; BUSSE V. UNITED STATES; MARTIN V. NORTH CAROLINA; BARFIELD V. NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1981-12-07
Nos. 80-1994; No. 80-2114; No. 81-98; No. 81-112; No. 81-284; No. 81-368; No. 81-443; No. 81-5129; No. 81-5132; No. 81-5336; No. 81-5372
454 U.S. 1117 Supreme Court of the United States (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, 748 F.2d 125 (3d Cir. 1984)
    …uestionable as to whether a court could ever permit a defendant to knowingly waive her right to the effective assistance of counsel when her own lawyer will testify against her. See United States v. DeFalco, 644 F. 2d 132 (3d Cir.1980), reh. denied, 454 U.S. 1117, 102 S.Ct. 693, 70 L.Ed.2d 655 (1981). In Glasser, the Supreme Court held that the right to assistance of counsel “contemplates that such assistance be untrammeled and unimpaired by a court order requiring that one lawyer shall simultaneously repre…
  • Powell v. Sheriff Jacqueline Barrett, 541 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2008)
    …s. See Clements v. Logan, 454 U.S. 1304, 1305, 102 S.Ct. 284, 286 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice) (noting that the jail’s strip search policy had been “adopted after the shooting of a deputy by a misdemeanant who had not been strip-searched”), vacated, 454 U.S. 1117, 102 S.Ct. 961, 71 L.Ed.2d 105 (1981); Johannes v. Alameda County Sheriff's Dep’t, No. C 04-458MHP, 2006 WL 2504400, at *4-6 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 29, 2006) (discussing in statistical detail as well as practical terms the contraband problem at a large coun…
    1 / 3
  • …dicata and is effective not only on the immediate parties but also on their privies;” and Nash Board of Education v. Biltmore Company, 640 F. 2d 484, 486-487 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878, 102 S.Ct. 359, 70 L.Ed.2d 188 rehearing denied, 454 U.S. 1117, 102 S.Ct. 692, 70 L.Ed.2d 654. No party has discussed this point. . Irwin Belk was called as a witness by the plaintiffs and examined as an adverse party. See 611(b), Fed.R. of Evid.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw