TRUONG DINH HUNG

v.

UNITED STATES; AND HUMPHREY V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• Loyce E. Hayes v. Dep't OF THE Navy, 727 F.2d 1535 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …rdingly, under our statutory scope of review, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c), we affirm the MSPB decision. AFFIRMED. . Fucik v. United States, 655 F. 2d 1089, 228 Ct.Cl. 379 (1981); Brewer v. United States, 647 F. 2d 1093, 227 Ct.Cl. 276 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144, 102 S.Ct. 1005, 71 L.Ed.2d 296 (1982); Tucker v. United States, 624 F. 2d 1029, 224 Ct.Cl. 266 (1980); Masino v. United States, 589 F. 2d 1048, 218 Ct.Cl. 531 (1978); Urbina v. United States, 530 F. 2d 1387, 209 Ct.Cl. 192 (1976); Barron v. United…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Schapansky v. Dep't OF Transp., 735 F.2d 477 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …. 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(2)(A) (Supp.II 1978). To be harmful the error must substantially impair the employee’s rights. Shaw v. Postal Service, 697 F. 2d 1078 (Fed.Cir.1983); Brewer v. Postal Service, 647 F. 2d 1093, 227 Ct.Cl. 276 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144, 102 S.Ct. 1005, 71 L.Ed.2d 296 (1982). Nothing of record would indicate that if the shortened time of notice were error (and as above indicated it was not), it impaired Schapansky’s rights in any manner. Schapansky argues that the President’s Augus…
• Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …Hoska v. United States Dep’t of the Army, 677 F. 2d 131, 135, 139 (D.C.Cir.1982); McDonough v. United States Postal Serv., 666 F. 2d 647, 648, 651 (1st Cir.1981); Brewer v. United States Postal Serv., 647 F. 2d 1093, 1096 (Ct.Cl.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144, 102 S.Ct. 1005, 71 L.Ed.2d 296 (1982). One commentator has suggested, however, that “[a]lthough no trial de novo is held at the circuit court level, the court’s statutorily required review amounts to that. The court must look at the agency’s action…

  ← 1 / 2 →