HOMETTE CORP.

v.

HARVEY, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• United States v. Gallo, 763 F.2d 1504 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …days following arraignment to prepare for trial, the trial judge’s denial of the motion constitutes an abuse of discretion and violates the defendant’s sixth amendment right to counsel. Linton v. Perini, 656 F. 2d 207 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1162, 102 S.Ct. 1036, 71 L.Ed.2d 318 (1982); see also United States v. Wirsing, 719 F. 2d 859 (6th Cir.1983). We find the situation in these cases to be analogous to Gallo’s charge under the RICO count, a complex charge with a prompt request for a contin…
• Matter of Cash Currency Exch., Inc. v. Shine, 762 F.2d 542 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …h, welfare, morals and safety, but not to “regulatory laws that directly conflict with the control of the res or property by the bankruptcy court.” State of Missouri v. United States Bankruptcy Court, 647 F. 2d 768, 776 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1162,102 S.Ct. 1035, 71 L.Ed.2d 318 (1982). Thus, in State of Missouri, the court held the exception inapplicable to state liquidation proceedings involving insolvent grain warehouses, stating that [Missouri's grain laws, although regulatory in- nature,…
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. The Rath Packing Co., 787 F.2d 318 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …fundamental debtor protections provided by the Bankruptcy Act and is inapplicable only where a governmental unit sues to protect the public safety and health. Relying on Missouri v. Bankruptcy Court, 647 F. 2d 768, 776 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1162, 102 S.Ct. 1035, 71 L.Ed.2d 318 (1982), Rath argues that an action brought by EEOC, although a regulatory agency, is stayed by the automatic stay provision because it is primarily directed to making aggrieved persons financially whole. EEOC argues…