CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL.
v.
FERNANDEZ ET AL.; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. RODRIGUEZ; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. SANTIAGO DE ORTA; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. ANGIUTA DE RIOS; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. SANCHEZ; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. SANTANA; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. PEREZ-RAMIREZ; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. ROMAN DE MOLINA; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. COLLAZO; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. GARCIA; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. LOPEZ DE FERRA; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. BELTRAN; CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. CACHO DE FREYTES; AND CHARDON, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. V. NAVARRO; GORDON V. HEIMANN, UNITED STATES COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, ET AL.; GORDON V. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ET AL.; AND GORDON V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ET AL.; BEHAR V. SOUTHEAST BANK TRUST CO., N. A., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BEHAR; HERRON V. PENDLETON, SABIAN & CRAFT ET AL.; PEREA V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ET AL., IN RE BOYDEN

U.S. | 1982-01-11
Nos. 81-249; No 81-553; No. 81-5410; No. 81-5456; No. 81-5463; No. 81-5498; No. 81-5613
454 U.S. 1166 Supreme Court of the United States (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.D. Hamilton v. 1ST Source Bank, 895 F.2d 159 (4th Cir. 1990)
    …the 180 days. Yet, in cases concerning discriminatory discharge, notification of the discharge is the focal point, not notification of the alleged discrimination. See Chardon v. Fernandez, 454 U.S. 6, 102 S.Ct. 28, 70 L.Ed.2d 6 (1981), reh’g denied, 454 U.S. 1166, 102 S.Ct. 1042, 71 L.Ed.2d 322 (1982) (claimants notified on date they received letters stating final decision to terminate their appointments); Delaware [*168] State College v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 101 S.Ct. 498, 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980) (limitations…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw