CORTEZ, AKA CORTEZ-ESPINOZA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• State v. Perez, 438 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …ayton v. State, 372 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (disclosure of confidential informant properly denied where other witness available to testify to what the informant would testify); United States v. Jiles, 658 F. 2d 194 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923, 102 S.Ct. 1282, 71 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982) (same); United States v. Shursen, 649 F. 2d 1250 (8th Cir.1981) (same). Finally, we consider whether Perez’s entrapment claim comes within the separate and more widely recognized exception that where a private…
• In re the Forfeiture OF $6 v. Oswald Coleman and Jessie Williams, 505 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
  …lid and some have been upheld. U.S. v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); U.S. v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981) cert, den., 455 U.S. 923, 102 S.Ct. 1281, 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982). Because the money seized is not contraband per se the Department is bound to return it to the persons from whom it was taken. AFFIRMED. UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.…
• Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1983)
  …created no liberty interest. Other courts agree that an expectation of receiving process is not, without more, a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause. See, e. g., United States v. Jiles, 658 F. 2d 194, 200 (CA3 1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 923 (1982); Bills v. Henderson, 631 F. 2d 1287, 1298-1299 (CA6 1980); Pugliese v. Nelson, 617 F. 2d 916, 924-925 (CA2 1980); Cofone v. Manson, 594 F. 2d, at 938; Lombardo v. Meachum, 548 F. 2d 13, 14-16 (CA1 1977); Adams v. Wainwright, 512 F. Supp. 948,…