LADMER

v.

UNITED STATES; AND DILAPI V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• State v. Katz, 438 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …ecember 21, 1981 did not constitute nonavailability so as to toll the running of the speedy trial period. Affirmed. . Appellee’s petition for a writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court on February 22, 1982. Katz v. Florida, 455 U.S. 938, 102 S.Ct. 1429, 71 L.Ed.2d 649 (1982). . The order granting discharge makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 2. The Defendant has not waived the applicable time period by his attorneys’ letter of December 18, 1981, advising…
• Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (U.S. 1988)
  …cted if omitted material information had been disclosed, see Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U. S., at 153-154, or if the misrepresentation had not been made, see Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F. 2d 175, 188 (CA3 1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 938 (1982), would place an unnecessarily unrealistic evidentiary burden on the Rule 10b-5 plaintiff who has traded on an impersonal market. Cf. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U. S., at 385. Arising out of considerations of fairness, public policy…
• Randall v. Loftsgaarden, 478 U.S. 647 (U.S. 1986)
  …nd equity value, Brief for Respondents 11, and that some courts have held that investors may sue for fraud where a tax shelter investment has not produced promised tax benefits. See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F. 2d 175 (CA3 1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 938 (1982). We have already established that Congress did not design §12(2) to accommodate these arguments, and that § 28(a) does not place them on a surer footing. Respondents essentially ask us to treat tax benefits as a separate asset that is acquir…

  ← 1 / 2 →