WATERS
v.
UNITED STATES
WATERS
UNITED STATES
455 U.S. 947
Supreme Court of the United States (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jenkins v. Local 705 Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters Pension Plan, 713 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1983)…U.S. 56, 101 S.Ct. 1559, 1562, 67 L.Ed.2d 732 (1981); International Union, UAW v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 383 U.S. 696, 705, 86 S.Ct. 1107, 1113, 16 L.Ed.2d 192 (1966); Davidson v. Roadway Express, Inc., 650 F. 2d 902, 903 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 947, 102 S.Ct. 1447, 71 L.Ed.2d 661 (1981). The court, in making this determination, must decide which statute of limitations period is “the most appropriate one provided by state law.” United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell, supra, at 1563; John [*251…1 / 2
-
Flores v. The Levy Co., 757 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1985)…84); Hall v. Printing and Graphic Arts Union, 696 F. 2d 494 (7th Cir.1982), or has failed to represent the employee fairly before the grievance or arbitration committee, Davidson v. Roadway Express, Inc., 650 F. 2d 902 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 947, 102 S.Ct. 1447, 71 L.Ed.2d 661 (1982), has no significance in relation to the substance of a section 301 claim, namely, whether the union has breached its duty of fair representation. See also Storck v. International Broth, of Teamsters, 712 F. 2d…