PALAMONE

v.

UNITED STATES; AND GERRY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …proof of multiple conspiracies under an indictment alleging a single conspiracy.” United States v. Sutherland, 656 F. 2d 1181, 1189 (5th Cir.1981) (citing Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949, 102 S.Ct. 1451, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). A conviction obtained under such circumstances must be set aside unless the defendant’s substantial rights were not affected. Id. To prove a single RICO conspiracy the government must show that the conspira…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Russell, 703 F.2d 1243 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …n Dixon’s view, constitutes a fatal variance from the offense charged in the indictment. The appellant must show that the variance affected his substantial rights. United States v. Sutherland, 656 F. 2d 1181, 1190 n. 6 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949, 102 S.Ct. 1451, 71 L.Ed.2d 663, cert. denied, 455 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982). We conclude that the trial judge correctly allowed the jury, under proper instruction, to determine whether one or more conspiracies existed. United…
• United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …idence would support finding both a single conspiracy and multiple [*1500] conspiracies, a defendant may be entitled to a jury instruction on multiple conspiracies. United States v. Sutherland, 656 F. 2d 1181, 1189 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949, 102 S.Ct. 1451, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). A failure to give such an instruction is not reversible error, however, unless the defendant can show prejudice. Id. . Compare Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (va…